Sunday, September 13, 2026

Article by Ruthie about FYI

Housing after Foster Care is Hard Enough Without Made-Up Barriers
Ruth White, The Imprint, Sept. 7, 2026.

I am a longtime sufferer of “Fear of Missing Out Syndrome,” or FOMO. Shucks, I’m having it as I write this. My neighbors are partying in Ocean City, MD, while I’m stuck in the office. What fun they must be having flitting from boat, to beach, to bar … without me.

But this somewhat frivolous emotion is held in check by the experiences of the many current and former foster youth I talk to every day who are trying to stabilize their housing situation so they can begin to build a life and a career. For far too many of them, there is no need for FOMO: they are definitely missing out. 

Imagine living in your car, or celebrating your 22nd birthday in a homeless shelter, or falling prey to traffickers to secure a couch to sleep on for the night. All the while knowing that there is something called the Melania Trump Foster Youth to Independence (FYI) initiative so agile that all your child welfare worker needed to do was ask your local public housing authority to order a Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) just for you. 

And yet, here you are, not knowing where you will park to sleep tonight or what public bathroom you will use to get ready for work in the morning. But you know FYI exists, you know foster youth designed it, you know it is fully funded, and it is codified in federal law through the Fostering Stable Housing Opportunities Act.

And now, sitting there all alone you realize that for some inexplicable reason, that option was forfeited on your behalf. That yields a special kind of exasperation far worse than FOMO.

The more curious you are, the worse it feels. A simple Google search reveals that FYI was established seven years ago by Dr. Ben Carson, former secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in partnership with foster youth from ACTION Ohio and the National Center for Housing and Child Welfare, which I lead. 

Scroll further and you find videos of Dr. Carson’s successor Scott Turner, who never misses an opportunity to promote FYI and visit with youth ambassadors for the initiative. The videos are widely circulated on social media. He is joined in his breathless enthusiasm by HUD Assistant Secretary Joe DeFelice and a powerful team of regional administrators like foster care alumnus, Chris Patterson. They are blanketing the country with promotion about FYI as a platform for self-sufficiency — leaving no question about their commitment.

So far more than 9,000 young adults have signed a lease for a home of their own where they can come and go as they please. They are no longer part of a system or worse, “the system.” They are neighbors who contribute to their communities as little league coaches, baristas, social workers, police officers, pastors, cashiers, nurses, teachers, entrepreneurs, homeowners, moms, dads, aunties and friends. And these success stories are out there, all over the internet for anyone to read. It is breathtaking.

Imagine reading about this on a computer at the public library where you go to wash up and find respite because you have no home. I’ll tell you what you’d think: Why am I missing out on this?

I know that what I’m describing happens every day because sometimes, their research leads them to my organization. They find me, or their caseworkers find me, and then we sprint. I may not be a former college track star like Secretary Turner, but when it comes to clearing bureaucratic hurdles, I’m a gold medalist. 

The most frustrating part of this is not that the barriers aren’t real; they are a vexing admixture of learned helplessness, paternalism and institutional parochialism among the professional class.

Here are some of the fictional roadblocks youth confront and we clear together.

“Our community doesn’t have FYI.” 

Nonsense. There are 2,174 public housing authorities eligible to administer FYI vouchers. This provides nationwide coverage. FYI is universal, it is available to every public housing authority that administers vouchers in the U.S.

“There’s not enough funding for FYI.”

Wrong. This one is particularly troubling because HUD announced on July 27, 2026, that they had so much money left over for FYI, that Congress allowed them to use $25 million to cover shortfalls in the another voucher program for homeless single, disabled adults. 

 “Our public housing authority is in a financial shortfall.”

This is a common misconception that has made its way across the country.  But read HUD’s December 2025 shortfall letter and find that FYI is exempt from HUD’s shortfall strategy. 

“We are out of vouchers.” 

This might have been a problem before, but HUD eliminated the 50 voucher per year cap for jurisdictions on July 27, 2026. That’s just from the housing side. As such, there is no need for waiting lists or bottlenecks.  

“Our child welfare agency can’t fund the services component of FYI.”

The list of services in FYI (like help with education, employment, financial management, housing, emotional support and assured connections to caring adults) is cut and pasted from the John H. Chafee Foster Care Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood. Obviously you can fund these services with Chafee because FYI was written by foster youth to complement Chafee. 

“Youth have to be homeless to be eligible.”

It is hard for me to dignify this one with a response but: just read the notice. It says “homeless or at risk of homelessness at age 16 or older.” To quote another First Lady: this concern is a nothingburger. You do not have to be homeless at the time of referral. You might be homeless or at risk, but you do not have to be in that state. The point of FYI is to prevent homelessness, not require it. 

“Youth have to pick extended foster care or an FYI voucher.” 

Quite the opposite. Youth can and in many cases should maximize their time in extended foster care, and then tap FYI. Combined, those two programs offer sustainable housing through and in many cases beyond age 25.

The list of nonsense and myths goes on. If I weren’t in constant contact with actual youth, scarred and bewildered in the wake of these unfounded crises, shooting the misconceptions down would be a satisfying hobby.

But there is real joy in witnessing agency leaders, and most especially, the child welfare caseworkers who are closest to the youth move so rapidly from grief to relief. They are empowered when they don’t have to remain on the sidelines. They are renewed in their love for the work when they see that the youth they care so deeply about can be a part of this beautiful story too and their appreciation is palpable. 

FOMO is one kind of sinking sensation. Knowing that you could have moved faster to embrace FYI, but you didn’t, is an equally crushing realization. Going forward, we can all feel a part of this youth-written solution to close the gaps through which foster youth might otherwise fall into homelessness. 

Now, if you’ll excuse me, the beach awaits.

~ Ruth White is the executive director of the National Center for Housing and Child Welfare.

Wednesday, September 09, 2026

Article about the Montgomery County CARE House

Dayton family donates $1M to Montgomery County CARE House
Ben Dannemiller, Dayton Daily News, August 6, 2026.

Montgomery County’s child advocacy center received its largest ever donation Wednesday, Aug. 5, according to a release by Dayton Children’s Hospital.

Patricia and Richard Glennon Jr. made a $1 million donation to the Montgomery County CARE House, with the aim of assisting a $5.3 million expansion project.

“Our son works for the Montgomery County prosecutor’s office, so we are acutely aware of the critical role CARE House plays in protecting children and supporting healing,” Patricia and Richard Glennon said.

CARE House helps children in abusive situations by bringing “together experts from medicine, law enforcement, child protective services, prosecution and victim advocacy to provide a coordinated, compassionate response,” according to its page on Dayton Children’s website

CARE House demand has increased in recent years, prompting the need for an expansion. The amount of children seeking care nearly doubled to 1,100 from 2016 to 2025.

“We’re seeing more children than ever before, and every one of them deserves access to the specialized care and support they need,” CARE House Director Amy Ferguson said via the press release.

The expansion is set to add additional therapy spaces, a soundproof forensic interview room, outdoor healing space and more.

Jesse's first article about the Legislative Committee

How Ohio lawmakers are looking into juvenile justice concerns
Jesse Bethea, NBC4, August 25, 2026.

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — A new legislative study committee will examine serious concerns among lawmakers and child welfare experts about how the juvenile justice system treats youth who have been adjudicated delinquent.

The Study Committee to Evaluate the Placement of Delinquent Children in Residential Facilities held its first hearing Monday morning, co-chaired by Rep. Andrea White (R-Kettering). 

With little time left in the 136th General Assembly, White said her committee will “hit the ground running” and continue its work until the end of this year, ultimately producing a report and recommendations for the governor, legislature and the public. 

The idea for a study committee came out of legislation White and Rep. Phil Plummer (R-Dayton) worked on two years ago, trying to establish stronger accountability for the hundreds of juvenile group homes operating in Ohio. 

White said during that process they learned, “many times youth who had been adjudicated delinquent by the juvenile court system were being placed in the care of children’s services agencies instead of being placed in detention centers.” 

“The children’s services agencies are struggling to find proper places to care for these kids,” White said. “These children are being mixed in with kids in the foster care system in some of these group homes who’ve been traumatized and had violations against themselves.” 

Committee member Rep. Erika White (D-Springfield Twp.) said while she shares concerns about mixing adjudicated delinquents with youth who have been removed from dangerous or abusive homes, she also wants the committee to examine whether group home settings are even helpful to adjudicated youth. 

“They’re children; we have to remember that. Yes, they’re accountable for the crime they committed, but how do we help them become adults who are part of our community and our society?” Erika White said. “What does it look like to truly help a child to go from being a juvenile delinquent or in the juvenile justice system to being an adult?”

Incentives For Diversion
Judges in Ohio have broad sentencing discretion, and juvenile judges are incentivized to divert adjudicated youth away from detention facilities operated by the Department of Youth Services (DYS). Since the 1990s, Ohio’s RECLAIM program has granted money for local, community-based juvenile corrections programs, with amounts determined by the number of children diverted out of the justice system. 

The more children a judge diverts from DYS detention, the more funds are available for their community. RECLAIM says its program has reduced overcrowding in the state’s youth institutions and allowed DYS to focus treatment and rehabilitation efforts on more serious, repeat youth offenders. 

It’s also resulted in youth who are diverted away from the juvenile justice system ending up in the child protective services system instead, as Angela Sausser, executive director of the Public Children Services Association of Ohio (PCSAO), explained to lawmakers Monday. 

On any given day in 2025, according to Sausser, three percent of the youth entering children services custody did so due to delinquency or unruliness, eight percent entered due to mental health or substance abuse disorders, and eight percent entered as “dependent,” a term sometimes used by juvenile courts to refer to youth adjudicated for serious offenses. In 2021, more than nine percent of all youth who entered children services custody were diverted from juvenile justice. More than a quarter of those were accused or convicted of a felony offense. 

“The purpose of the children services system is to protect children from abuse and neglect by their parents or caregivers,” Sausser said. “Increasingly, however, Ohio’s child protective services are expected to serve children whose needs and reasons for coming into PCSA custody fall primarily within other systems, including behavioral health (mental health and substance use), developmental disabilities, and juvenile justice, particularly when those systems lack sufficient treatment services, placement options, or funding.” 

Besides funding incentives, there are practical reasons why juvenile judges prefer to divert youth away from detention. As Paul Pfeifer, former state Supreme Court justice and executive director of the Ohio Judicial Conference, testified in 2024, juvenile judges are often unaware of specialized residential facilities that can accept and properly treat delinquent children.

Nor is separating children with criminal histories from other children in foster care necessarily the best choice. Kate Rossman, policy manager for the Ohio Children’s Alliance, told lawmakers in 2024 that such an approach actually “contradicts therapeutic best practices.” 

There is also the fact that, as Pfeifer pointed out, “many children involved with the juvenile court system have dual status as both an adjudicated delinquent and a foster child.” 

Erika White echoed that point, saying there are plenty of examples of youth in the juvenile justice system who have also experienced the sort of mistreatment or abuse that would require attention from child protective services. In other cases, said Erika White, adults influence children to commit crimes, knowing the consequences will be lighter. 

“We have to realize these are children where the adults or the village that’s around that child has failed,” she said. 

Finally, the alternative — institutionalizing more adjudicated children — is also undesirable. Sausser told the committee that PCSAO strongly supports reforms that reduce the reliance on placing kids in restrictive institutional settings. 

“However, the responsibility and cost of serving these children have shifted to the children services system, which must comply with court orders and cannot decline service or placement of a child,” Sausser said. 

“There Is Money To Be Had” 
Making the placement of adjudicated youth an additional responsibility of child protective services adds strain to a system already at the breaking point.

The number of Ohio children in foster care has declined in recent years, but the cost of placing those children in appropriate settings has gone up. The Ohio Department of Children and Youth (DCY) has struggled to establish standard rates for foster placements, in part because providers have not voluntarily shared useful data with the state. 

Child welfare professionals like Tammy Moore Morton, director of Scioto County Job and Family Services, have seen firsthand how and why foster placement costs can deplete a county’s resources. She described how one child in her agency’s custody ended up in at least a dozen different placements around the state because they exhibited “extreme behaviors.” 

“The facilities can decide to increase our daily rate to any amount they want without necessarily increasing the level of care,” Morton said. “They know this child is hard to place, so they take advantage of the situation and charge the county unreasonably or threaten discharge or return the child to the lobby of the agency.”

Numbers published by PCSAO bear this out; in 2021, about six percent of youth who came into care had to spend at least one night sleeping at their county children services agency because there were no available providers willing to accept that child’s level of care.

Testimony on the first day of hearings circled at times around the implication that many group home providers see foster care first and foremost as a business, which DCY director Kara Wente tied to the dramatic increase in placement costs. 

“If the placement’s between $236 and $400 per day, there is money to be had there,” Wente said. “And I would hope that they want to serve the mission of actually helping kids.” 

A uniquely high concentration of group homes has appeared in the Dayton area in recent years, especially in high-poverty, high-crime neighborhoods. Montgomery County Juvenile Judge Helen Wallace said that also appears to be part of the business model. 

“We have heard that business developers are buying up cheap real estate and staffing them with young, inexperienced staff who have not gone through extensive training that might be available to higher-level group homes for the high per diem, per child rates,” Wallace said. 

Treating foster group homes as a business model also means, according to Wente, “they actually have to take kids from out of town to meet the numbers and make it lucrative.” 

Counties all over the state end up sending kids to Dayton, far from their families and friends and making reunification even harder. When group homes are concentrated in impoverished areas and supervised by untrained and inattentive staff members, delinquent youth are also at increased risk of reoffending, sometimes against other kids in the home. 

In 2024, Dayton Police Chief Eric Henderson told lawmakers his officers had seen a notable increase in calls for service involving youth group homes. 

He described one case in which a child had absconded from a group home and was hesitant to return, eventually telling officers he had been touched inappropriately by another youth resident. In another incident, a 14-year-old was taken to the hospital with life-threatening injuries after other kids in the same group home beat him up for stealing a video game console. 

According to Henderson, no adults or group home employees were aware of the assault.

Friday, September 04, 2026

100 youth are entrusted to Fox Run, with residents as young as 5 years old

Ohio teen treatment center CEO accused of unlawful sexual contact with minor in police sting
Brittany Hailer, The Marshall Project, Sept.1, 2026.

The chief executive of one of Ohio’s largest residential treatment centers for youth is accused of driving nearly three hours to meet someone for sex whom he believed was a 14-year-old girl. Instead, he met a police officer, according to police and court documents.

Randall J. Mackendrick, CEO of Fox Run Center for Children and Adolescents, was arrested on Aug. 29 by North Ridgeville police in Lorain County after having driven about 175 miles from St. Clairsville, where the facility is located and where he lives, police said.

Mackendrick, 59, was released from custody on Monday after posting a $125,000 bond. He is charged with unlawful sexual contact with a minor, importuning, disseminating matter harmful to a juvenile and possessing criminal tools.

He does not currently have an attorney listed in court records, and did not respond to calls and requests for comment on his personal cellphone.

Mackendrick first made contact with the person he believed was a teenager on June 2, according to police. He was scheduled to appear for a preliminary hearing on Sept. 2, but it has been moved to Sept. 9, according to court records.

Universal Health Services, which owns Fox Run, said Mackendrick no longer works for the organization and does not have access to the residential treatment facility.

“To our present knowledge, this is a personal matter arising from conduct alleged to have occurred outside the facility, not connected to any current or former patients,” a spokesperson wrote in an email. UHS said it is reviewing the “circumstances surrounding this matter and, as appropriate, will evaluate relevant policies and practices at the facility.”

The Ohio Department of Behavioral Health, the state agency responsible for licensing the facility, is aware of Mackendrick’s arrest, a spokesman said, and declined to comment any further, citing an open criminal investigation.

Fox Run is a 100-bed residential treatment facility that accepts children as young as 5 — many of whom are victims of sexual assault and are placed at the facility for mental health treatment due to the trauma they endured.

In July, a Marshall Project investigation found that children at the facility were subjected to unsafe restraints and experienced physical and sexual assaults and medical neglect. Dozens of emergency responses, including youth hospitalizations and arrests, were documented in local police records but were absent from Ohio’s database of reportable incidents.

The investigation sparked a community conversation online, with former Fox Run patients and workers sharing their experiences, and residents of St. Clairsville and elsewhere noting their surprise at what was going on at the facility and expressing their sympathy. Over the weekend, the conversation continued, as news spread of Mackendrick's arrest.

“Randy Mackendrick may have a legal case to answer to, but Fox Run survivors have been carrying out their own stories for years. We want answers, too,” said Paitin Pahoundis, who spent three years at the facility in her teens during the pandemic.

Addison Torrence, who was housed at a now-shuttered troubled youth facility and serves on a state committee investigating the placement of children in residential facilities, said he was “alarmed and sickened” by the charges against Mackendrick.

Torrence said he intends to ask the state licensing agency about how it is responding to the arrest and what measures it is taking to ensure the safety of the children at the facility given the issues surfaced in the Marshall Project investigation.

Sunday, August 30, 2026

Another article about HB 25

State offers a plan but no money to do it Ohio wants schools to help foster kids navigate the system, but compensating staff isn’t in the proposal.
Karan Singh, Cleveland Plain Dealer, August 29, 2026. 

Aside from uprooting a child’s home life, a new foster placement also poses the risk of disrupting their educational stability.

As kids in the system switch schools, their records can go missing and some even lose credits amid the shuffle.

To make that transition less chaotic, lawmakers have been working on a plan to assign designated school staff to help those students navigate enrollment, transportation, academic resources and life after graduation.

Sponsored by Reps. Dontavius Jarrells of Columbus and Wadsworth’s Sharon Ray, House Bill 25 now looks dramatically different from its original draft. The bipartisan legislation initially proposed a $15 million college scholarship program, but was rewritten into a K-12 support system during its five hearings before the House Workforce and Higher Education Committee.

The revised proposal passed the lower chamber in March with overwhelming support and is currently in the Senate Education Committee, where it has received two hearings. So far, it has received no opponent testimony.

The Fostering School Success Act
Federal law already requires schools and child welfare agencies to work together to protect educational stability for children in foster care. That includes efforts to keep students in their original school when appropriate and enroll them quickly if a transfer is necessary. Supporters told senators that the problem is not the absence of rules so much as inconsistent implementation from one community to another.

Also known as the Fostering School Success Act, HB 25 would spell out those responsibilities more clearly in Ohio law:

  • Every school district, community school and STEM school would designate a foster care education liaison. That person would coordinate with child welfare agencies on enrollment, records, transportation and decisions about whether a student should remain in their school of origin. The liaison would also handle disputes over school-placement decisions and transportation costs in addition to helping train school staff.
  • Every individual school building would have a foster family navigator. This staff member would be the main point of contact for students in foster care and would check in with each of them at least once per semester. Navigators would connect students with academic and nonacademic resources. Older students would also receive help finding college aid and planning for college, job training or the workforce.
  • Those employees would receive annual training developed by the Department of Education and Workforce in collaboration with the departments of Children and Youth, Higher Education and Job and Family Services.

  • Foster agencies would have a clearer role in preparing young people for adulthood. HB 25 would cement existing administrative requirements into state law, ensuring foster agencies help set up young people to live independently. Those services can include career preparation, financial management, housing skills and postsecondary support. Agencies would also conduct life-skills assessments and provide school navigators with a copy upon request. 

The idea is to create a chain of responsibility rather than leave a student or caseworker wondering who to call.

Help is available, but inconsistent
According to the Legislative Service Commission, public schools in Ohio served more than 14,000 students in foster care during the 2024-25 school year while Cleveland Metropolitan School District alone served about 290. The research agency also noted that many districts already have counselors, social workers or other employees performing work similar to the proposed navigator duties.

Sponsors argue that is precisely the issue: support depends heavily on where a child happens to attend school rather than a consistent statewide standard.

“The truth of the matter is some of these positions were in name only,” Jarrells told lawmakers in the Senate. “They did not have the skill set nor the support to actually provide real care ... [a lot of students] had to figure it out on their own and many of them were not able to graduate.”

On behalf of the Children’s Defense Fund, Brianna Booker pointed to Hamilton County as evidence that a more coordinated model can work. She shared that its Kids in School Rule! program completed 922 reviews of whether students should remain at their current school and served nearly 600 students across three school systems over 2024-25, adding that participating seniors in the Cincinnati Public Schools district graduated at a 97% rate.

More responsibilities, but no extra pay
The bill’s first Senate hearing brought another issue into focus: do the added responsibilities come with a corresponding salary?

Sen. Catherine Ingram of Cincinnati noted that districts may assign new duties to counselors or other staff members who already have full workloads, which underscored that HB 25 contains no extra pay for liaisons or navigators.

“In terms of compensation, I don’t think we have that in this bill,” Jarrells responded, adding that the bill’s current goal is to first establish a baseline for what those jobs actually entail. “That is not to say that we can’t have those conversations for the budget in the next General Assembly.”

The Legislative Service Commission concluded that the current proposal could create additional work for districts that do not already provide those services, while state agencies would face minimal to no administrative costs.

A $15 million scholarship was scrapped
HB 25 was originally dubbed the Foster-to-College Scholarship Program, but that entire plan has now been dropped.

The first draft proposed a financial aid system for qualifying students who had been in foster or certain kinship care after turning 13. It would have set aside $15 million for scholarships, with $7.5 million available in each of the two fiscal years. Under that version, four full-time navigators would have helped current and former foster youth apply to college, secure financial aid and enroll.

Meanwhile, during negotiations over Ohio’s two-year state budget in 2025, Rep. Ray introduced a budget amendment for the program while foster care advocates testified in support of adding it to the spending plan. The effort continued through the budget process, but the Foster-to-College Scholarship Program was ultimately left out of the final version of the budget enacted that June.

That entire program disappeared from HB 25 as well when a substitute bill was adopted earlier this year. The scholarship, dedicated college navigators and monetary appropriation were removed while lawmakers added the district liaisons, building navigators and independent-living provisions.

In a statement shared with cleveland.com, Ray stated, “Per the recommendation of the committee Chair, resources are already available, the problem was connecting foster care youth with the resources they qualified for. The liaisons that HB 25 establishes will be able to connect foster care youth with the resources they do qualify for in job training programs, career-technical schools, colleges, and more.”

A follow-up comment from her office added, “There are several grants/scholarships that are centered around helping foster care youth go to college. You can find them easily via a google search. The new liaison position that is created in HB 25 would help foster care youth more easily access and apply to grants and scholarships that they are eligible for. HB 25 now helps foster care youth find resources that are already available.”

Jarrells has not responded to a request for comment yet, although he previously said, “We moved away from a single program and focused on building something stronger and more lasting.”

However, the scholarship program is not dead. Sen. Michele Reynolds of Canal Winchester introduced legislation parallel to HB 25 in the form of Senate Bill 13, which retains the Foster-to-College Scholarship Program as well as its appropriation. It received its first and only hearing in February.

Article about HB 25

Ohio Wants Every School to Guide Foster Kids, but Won't Pay for It
Travis Singleton, August 28, 2026.

Every Ohio school building would be required to designate a foster family navigator under a bill moving through the state legislature, but the measure comes with no new money attached to pay for it. Substitute House Bill 25, also known as the Fostering School Success Act, would require every Ohio school district, community school and STEM school to name a foster care education liaison, while also mandating a building-level navigator to work directly with students in foster care.

The bill, sponsored by state Reps. Dontavius Jarrells and Sharon Ray, passed the Ohio House of Representatives in March and is now sitting in the Senate Education Committee, according to Cleveland.com. It has received two Senate Education Committee hearings so far and no opponent testimony, the outlet reports. Ohio public schools served more than 14,000 students in foster care during the 2024-25 school year, and state education data separately counted 14,455 foster students enrolled statewide that year, according to the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce.

What the Navigators and Liaisons Would Actually Do
Under the bill, foster family navigators would connect students with academic and nonacademic resources and check in with each student in foster care at least once per semester, per Cleveland.com's reporting. For older students, navigators would help with college aid applications and planning for college, job training or the workforce. Foster care education liaisons, meanwhile, would coordinate enrollment, records, transportation and school-of-origin decisions, and would handle disputes over school placement and transportation costs, while also helping train school staff.

Liaisons and navigators would receive annual training developed by the Department of Education and Workforce in collaboration with the departments of children and youth, higher education, and job and family services, the outlet notes. Foster agencies would also be required to conduct life-skills assessments and help prepare young people for independent living, which the bill defines as including career preparation, financial management, housing skills and postsecondary support.

A Federal Mandate That Existed Only on Paper
Federal law already requires schools and child welfare agencies to work together to protect educational stability for children in foster care, and under Title I of the Every Student Succeeds Act, Ohio districts have been required since 2016 to designate a district-level foster care liaison. But the law left building-level support structures to state and local discretion, according to the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce.

That gap mattered in practice. Statewide youth advocacy group Foster Action Ohio has reported that existing district liaisons often exist on paper but not consistently in practice, and foster youth testified in late 2022 that they had zero awareness of, or proactive outreach from, their assigned district contacts. HB 25's building-level navigator requirement is aimed squarely at that failure.

The Money That Disappeared
House Bill 25 was originally proposed as a $15 million college scholarship program that would have set aside funding for scholarships and provided four full-time navigators for qualifying students who had been in foster or certain kinship care after turning 13, per Cleveland.com. 

The substitute version removed the scholarship, the dedicated college navigators and the monetary appropriation entirely, instead adding the district liaisons, building navigators and independent-living provisions that now make up the bill.

House Bill 25 contains no extra pay for liaisons or navigators, meaning school districts would absorb the new administrative duties without new state funding. The Legislative Service Commission found that state agencies themselves would face minimal to no administrative costs, but also found the proposal could create additional work for districts that do not already provide similar services, according to Cleveland.com's review of the fiscal analysis.

Rep. Jarrells said the bill moved away from a single program to build something stronger and more lasting, per the outlet's reporting. Sharon Ray's office said HB 25 liaisons will help foster-care youth access and apply to eligible grants and scholarships, and Ray herself said the liaisons will connect foster-care youth with existing resources in job training programs, career-technical schools and colleges.

Scholarship Money Moves to a Separate Bill
The $15 million scholarship program didn't disappear from the legislature entirely — it was dropped from HB 25 and shifted into a companion measure, Senate Bill 13, introduced by Sen. Michele Reynolds. SB 13 retains the foster-to-college scholarship program and its appropriation, which would make available $7.5 million in each of two fiscal years to fund what Adoption Network Cleveland describes as a $7.5 million annual last-dollar scholarship covering full tuition, room and board for up to 1,000 foster youth attending Ohio colleges or trade schools.

SB 13 received its first and only hearing in February, and the foster-to-college scholarship program was left out of the final Ohio budget enacted in June 2025, according to Cleveland.com. That split creates a fragmented approach in which K-12 structural support and postsecondary financial aid now move through entirely separate legislative tracks, with no guarantee either reaches the governor's desk.

A History of Stalling in the Senate
This isn't the first time Ohio lawmakers have tried this. Substitute House Bill 25 is a reintroduction of House Bill 164 from 2024, which passed the Ohio House by an 85-5 vote in June 2024 but died in the Senate Finance Committee at the end of that legislative session, according to Adoption Network Cleveland. Lawmakers reintroduced the measure in early 2025 after the earlier bipartisan bill expired without a Senate vote.

The stakes for getting it right are steep. A 2023 report by the Children's Defense Fund-Ohio found that Ohio ranks in the bottom 10% of U.S. states on key indicators measured by the National Youth in Transition Database, with former foster youth experiencing higher rates of unemployment and justice-system involvement alongside lower high school completion rates than their national peers. A September 2025 systematic research review from the University of Connecticut, cited by the Annie E. Casey Foundation, found that 69% to 85% of foster youth nationwide complete a high school diploma or GED, compared with 95% of young adults overall, while only 8% to 12% earn a postsecondary degree by their mid- to late 20s.

Local Programs Show What's Possible
Cleveland.com's reporting points to existing local models that show what dedicated support can look like. Hamilton County's Kids in School Rule! program completed 922 reviews of whether students should remain at their current school during the 2024-25 year and served nearly 600 students across three school systems. Cincinnati Public Schools participating seniors graduated at a 97% rate that year. In Cleveland, the Cleveland Metropolitan School District served about 290 students in foster care during the same period.

Central Ohio has also seen private efforts try to fill the gap. The planned Masters Preparatory Academy in Columbus has partnered with Franklin County Children Services to reserve roughly 30% of its enrollment slots for foster youth starting in 2028, part of a broader single-gender boarding school plan that would integrate wraparound social services with academic support. Whether HB 25 becomes law may determine if similar structured support becomes standard across all 88 Ohio counties, rather than dependent on local initiative and philanthropy.

Friday, August 21, 2026

Ann Bischoff's new role, continuing to make a difference

Star House CEO Ann Bischoff to lead Community Housing Network
Nora Igelnik, Columbus Dispatch, August 19, 2026.

The Community Housing Network – the largest and longest-standing provider of permanent supportive housing in Franklin County – has announced it has a new chief executive officer.

Ann Bischoff, longtime CEO of Star House, which provides resources to teens and young adults experiencing homelessness, will take over as the Community Housing Network (CHN) CEO after two decades of experience in youth services, public policy and systems reform, according to an Aug. 19 press release. Bischoff will conclude her decade of work at Star House Sept. 4.

In her new role, Bischoff will oversee CHN's efforts to expand housing stability, strengthen community partnerships, support residents and address the growing need for affordable housing, according to the release.

The former CEO of CHN was Annissa Lambirth-Garrett, who joined the organization in January 2025. Lambirth-Garrett resigned from her position Oct. 23, 2025, to pursue new opportunities, JV Wulf, board chair of CHN, said in an email.

"The Board determined that the appropriate time for public communication was when we were prepared to share a complete leadership-transition plan and introduce the organization's next CEO," Wulf said. "Throughout the transition, CHN's operations, programs and community partnerships continued uninterrupted and were overseen by CHN's COO Tiana Purvis, who was named Interim CEO."

Bischoff said her first priority is to understand community needs

Bischoff told The Dispatch that it's been "the privilege of [her] life" to have served alongside her team at Star House and help vulnerable young people. However, what sparked her interest in a role at CHN was the fact that homelessness is undeniably on the rise, and the organization's approach to the issue is holistic.

"Community Housing Network understands that housing alone doesn't solve homelessness," Bischoff said. "If it did, we would have figured this out by now. It's really community. That's why their name is Community Housing Network. Neighbors helping neighbors, relationships that make the difference, and ending homelessness for people in our community."

CHN specializes in permanent supportive housing, providing people not only with housing, but with resources to address mental health or addiction, learn new job skills, raise their income level, attend school and more.

CHN offers more than 1,700 units of housing for people of all ages and backgrounds, Bischoff said.

"It is housing with wraparound services," Bischoff said. "Services like job connection, case management, therapy – services to ensure that the housing sticks long term. So, you'll notice their occupancy rate is high. The length of stay is high because the program is working."

Bischoff said her first priority will be to understand the needs of the community. She said she wants to meet with residents, neighbors and team members to learn more about different concerns and affordability issues. From there, she hopes to begin to build a strategic plan to not only create additional housing, but to improve and support CHN's current housing development.

The human services space is in the midst of a "historical moment," Bischoff said, which requires a "lean and mean" approach to survive shifts in government funding. Fundraising in innovative ways, turning existing assets into revenue, sharing back-office services with other agencies and considering new developments can help soften the blow, Bischoff said.

CHN has an opportunity to diversify its housing portfolio and bring in more revenue, Bischoff said. There are opportunities to expand from permanent supportive housing to workforce development and mixed-income housing.

"I believe CHN is uniquely positioned to play a major role in addressing our community's affordable housing crisis, and I'm truly honored to join this team," Bischoff told The Dispatch.

During Bischoff's transition to her role at CHN, Star House will maintain services with an interim leadership plan in place to support the organization while the search for a new CEO begins, according to the release.

Monday, August 10, 2026

Nunn Introduces Bill to Prevent Homelessness for Youth Aging Out of Foster Care
May 29, 2026

Housing Champion Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH) with OHIO YAB Youth Ambassadors

DES MOINES, IA — Representatives Zach Nunn (IA-03), Joyce Beatty (OH-03), Don Bacon (NE-02), Greg Landsman (OH-01), and Mike Carey (OH-15) today introduced the Housing Opportunities for Moving to Empowerment (HOME) for Foster Youth Act, bipartisan legislation to streamline access to housing assistance for youth transitioning out of foster care and help prevent homelessness before it starts.

“Kelly and I adopted two of our daughters through foster care, so I’ve seen firsthand both the promise of the system and the consequences when it falls short,” said Rep. Nunn. “Today, there are housing vouchers sitting unused while far too many foster youth face homelessness — not because they aren’t eligible, but because outdated rules force many young people to become homeless before they can qualify for help. The HOME for Foster Youth Act fixes that. It doesn’t create a new program or spend another taxpayer dollar. It simply cuts through the bureaucracy so the housing assistance Congress already approved can reach the foster youth it was intended to serve.”

Across the country, nearly one in four foster youth experience homelessness within four years of aging out of care, and roughly 50% of the nation’s homeless population has spent time in the foster care system.

In 2019, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) launched the Foster Youth to Independence (FYI) program to help foster youth secure stable housing as they transition into adulthood. However, a HUD Office of Inspector General report found that only 31% of FYI vouchers are currently utilized due to inconsistent implementation and administrative barriers.

“Too often, the foster care system fails to set young people up for success as independent adults,” said Rep. Beatty. “Having a home is not a privilege, it is a basic right that everyone deserves. I’m proud to introduce this bill to streamline the Foster Youth to Independence program and allow young people a safe transition into adulthood. Every child should have the security of a stable home and opportunity to build a successful future.”

The HOME for Foster Youth Act improves and streamlines the FYI voucher program by: 

  • Extending the voucher application window from 90 to 180 days before a youth exits foster care 
  • Removing duplicative language requiring foster youth to already be homeless or at risk of homelessness to qualify for assistance 
  • Clarifying that Education and Training Vouchers (ETV) are excluded from income calculations for FYI voucher eligibility 
  • Strengthening coordination between HUD and HHS to improve access to housing assistance for foster youth 

“Every young person aging out of foster care deserves a fair chance to build a stable and independent life,” said Rep. Bacon. “As a foster-to-adoptive parent, I know how important it is for these young people to have the support and stability they need during major life transitions. The HOME for Foster Youth Act cuts through unnecessary administrative confusion so eligible foster youth can access housing vouchers without delay and take the next step toward self-sufficiency. I’m grateful to work with Rep. Nunn to help ensure foster youth receive the support already intended for them.”

“Young people who have dealt with foster care deserve so much more from us. Our bill will make it easier for these kids to get good, reliable housing,” said Rep. Landsman.

“Too many former foster youth experience homelessness after aging out of care. Access to housing is critical for foster youth who are transitioning into adulthood so that they can keep their focus on their education, careers, and independence,” said Rep. Carey. “Congressman Nunn’s HOME for Foster Youth Act removes barriers and improves coordination between HUD and HHS, ensuring that foster youth have better access to FYI vouchers that can help them obtain secure housing. I am proud to support this legislation to ensure more foster youth can receive these housing vouchers that they’re already eligible for, as another means to support them on their paths to self-sufficiency.” 

“There is a direct pipeline from foster care to homelessness, and FYI vouchers are one of the most effective tools we have to break it,” said Rebecca Louve Yao, CEO, National Foster Youth Institute. “When issued effectively, FYI vouchers are a critical part of a stable foundation that most young adults need but too many foster youth never receive. The HOME for Foster Youth Act will make it easier for local agencies to support foster youth and reduce homelessness in their communities. Thank you to Representative Nunn for listening to foster youth, for fighting to make sure FYI vouchers actually reach the young people who need them, and for bringing foster youth HOME.” 

“We applaud Congressman Nunn’s swift action to remove a harmful and unnecessary reference to homelessness from the law governing HUD’s Foster Youth to Independence (FYI) vouchers,” said Ruth White, Executive Director, National Center for Housing and Child Welfare. “FYI was designed by alumni of foster care to prevent homelessness and human trafficking among older foster youth by aligning housing vouchers with effective transition planning — not by requiring young people to become homeless first. Yet in a growing number of communities, this language is being misread to mean that foster youth must be homeless, unemployed, or already in crisis to qualify, turning a prevention program into a failure requirement. As the organization that co-authored FYI with foster youth and alumni of ACTION Ohio, we urge Congress to pass Congressman Nunn’s no-cost HOME for Foster Youth Act without delay.” 

“Giving a child a home is a remarkable gift, and we know stable housing creates the foundation young people need to succeed as they transition into adulthood. Yet too many youth aging out of foster care face unnecessary barriers to accessing the support they need,” said Traci Schermerhorn, Founder and Executive Director, Foster SQUAD. “Foster SQUAD proudly supports the HOME for Foster Youth Act because every young person leaving foster care deserves a pathway to stability and independence. This legislation makes practical improvements that help ensure housing resources reach the youth who need them most.” 

“Youth voice is at the heart of everything we do; honoring their lived experience is key to improving policy”, said Ashley Brown, Founder and CEO, Selfless Love Foundation. “They expressed their concerns about housing eligibility and time limits on support that can impact their stability as they transition to adulthood, and we listened. The HOME for Foster Youth Act removes barriers, opening the door for youth across the country to access housing while they continue to gain the tools needed to succeed in the future.”

“Every young person deserves more than survival, they deserve dignity, stability, and the opportunity to thrive and pursue their passions to build a meaningful future,” said Dr. Amy Loyd, CEO, All4Ed. “For foster youth, housing is not separate from education or career success; it is foundational to both. The HOME for Foster Youth Act is an important step in ensuring young people have stable housing, because that stability creates the foundation students need to pursue pathways to college, careers, and long-term well-being.” 

The legislation does not create new federal spending or expand eligibility for housing vouchers. Instead, the bill aligns the law with the original intent of the FYI program and helps ensure eligible foster youth can access housing support without unnecessary barriers or delays.

The HOME for Foster Youth Act is endorsed by the National Foster Youth Institute, the National Center for Housing and Child Welfare, the Foster SQUAD, the Selfless Love Foundation, and All4Ed.

Text of the bill can be found here. 


From Principal to "Pops"

Ohio principal resigns over helping homeless teen, then adopts him
Grace Tucker, Cincinnati Enquirer, July 30, 2026.


Key Points:

  • A Lakota high school principal helped a student experiencing homelessness who was ordered to withdraw from the district.
  • The principal, Robert Burnside, was investigated for insubordination and ultimately resigned from his position.
  • Following his resignation, Burnside and his wife became the legal guardians of the student, Landerius "DeDe" Hayes.
  • DeDe has since graduated from a different district and now lives with the Burnside family.
  • Robert Burnside felt mixed emotions in the stands at Cintas Center, witnessing hundreds of Kings High School graduates accept their diplomas.

The former Lakota East High School principal first felt acute stress, which he likened to post-traumatic stress disorder, as memories returned from his nearly two decades leading high schools. Graduation ceremonies like this one, he said, used to be his Super Bowl.

But overriding the stress and the longing for the profession he once cherished was immense pride for the graduate he was supporting that day: Landerius "DeDe" Hayes.

Not too long ago, Burnside knew Hayes to be a junior walking his halls at Lakota East, one of many students Burnside liked humoring with his "goofy pants" he'd sport every Friday.

At the time, Hayes was the student experiencing homelessness who Burnside championed when Lakota ordered his withdrawal. He was the 16-year-old who, due to circumstances out of his control, didn't have an in-district address on file.

And Hayes was the student for whom Burnside put his career on the line, allowing the teenager to stay in classes despite his unenrollment – a situation that prompted a district investigation, Burnside's resignation from Lakota and departure from the education field at large. He now works in the private sector.

Landerius "DeDe" Hayes graduated from Kings High School in May.

A year later, in May 2026, a freshly graduated Hayes sits at Burnside's dining room table. Hayes, now 18, has grown accustomed to calling his former principal "Pops."

He has spent holidays and birthdays in his new home, with his new legal guardians, Burnside and his wife, Angel, and six new siblings – four brothers and two sisters.

Hayes says he, too, was overcome with emotions on his graduation day.

In the moments he walked across the stage to accept his diploma, Hayes said, "everything just went in slow motion. It didn't feel real."

Rob Burnside, DeDe Hayes and Angel Burnside stand together at Hayes' high school graduation in May.

After months of couch-surfing, student says Lakota 'kicked him out'

A Lakota student since the seventh grade, Hayes was weeks into his junior year, in October 2024, when an administrator hand delivered him a letter in the gym class. He was being ordered to withdraw from the district, the letter read.

"I'm getting kicked out of nowhere," he remembered thinking. "And then I just started asking around and trying to get help."

Asking for help had long been Hayes' lifeline for staying in school.

Hayes experienced homelessness for much of his high school life. He had a turbulent relationship with his biological mother, who moved out of the district's bounds in 2023. Due to limited space and safety concerns, Hayes was unable to live at her new address. And his father, who lacked custodial rights, didn't offer consistent support.

Landerius “DeDe” Hayes shows his Kings High School diploma and his Garret Butler Leadership Award for the Kings Knights varsity basketball team on Thursday, June 11 in Loveland. Hayes played basketball all four years of high school, picking up football and track as well during his senior year.

Crashing at friends' houses or even with his boss from AutoZone wasn't unusual for the high schooler. Some nights, he slept in his car, doing homework on his phone once his school laptop died and washing his clothes in the school's bathroom sinks.

Word got back to Lakota's central office that Hayes' mom had moved outside of the district's boundaries. Burnside said district officials didn't consider Hayes had never been to that address in the first place.

Immediately after Hayes was ordered to withdraw, Burnside said, teachers and coaches at Lakota East were eager to help and be "that blanket of support around DeDe that he needed."

His situation was out of the norm in a place like Lakota, a high-performing district in an affluent part of Butler County.

Burnside decided to allow Hayes back in classes – a choice that he ruminates on to this day.

"I own the fact that my communication could have been better. Maybe I didn't ask the right questions," Burnside said. "But I had nothing to gain out of this other than this is a kid that I care about, our school cares about and we want to help."

Landerius “DeDe” Hayes looks through certificate program papers from high school in his room on June 11 in Loveland. Hayes currently works as an auto technician for Honda and wants to pursue a career in aircraft mechanics.

An investigation, a resignation and a custody agreement

Burnside sat down with his wife and talked through the possibility of getting custody of Hayes so that he could continue attending Lakota. The couple were no strangers to opening their doors and expanding their family, having six children – two of whom are adopted.

After talking with Hayes' biological mother, the Burnsides began the process of becoming his legal guardians, but not without pitching the idea to Hayes first.

"I mean, that's a pretty big bomb to drop on a kid: 'Hey, come live with your principal,'" Burnside said. "I get that."

The Lakota principal sat Hayes down alongside Clint Adkins, his beloved basketball coach. The conversation was brief. Hayes quickly accepted. He told Burnside that the principal could provide the stability he had never known.

Rob Burnside looks to his son Landerius “DeDe” Hayes as he talks about his journey of overcoming homelessness and instability throughout high school before being placed in temporary custody of the Burnside family in November 2024 and being fully adopted in February 2025.

Burnside's plans changed Nov. 1, when he was notified that he was being placed on administrative leave as the district investigated him for insubordination. A letter from Rob Kramer, executive director of human resources, told Burnside he put himself and the district "in a potentially liable position" by allowing Hayes back in school.

The Enquirer at the time obtained the document through an Ohio Public Records Request. One of the questions was, "Did you consider the liability of this since he was unenrolled?" The questions also raised concerns about how the student was able to receive lunches at the school and what might happen if the student was ever hurt on school grounds.

An email from Superintendent Ashley Whitely alerted district families about Burnside's absence and said the district had "been investigating a concern that was brought to our attention." Within 15 minutes, Burnside said, the principal's picture was on "every news outlet."

"On social media, people saying either I'm a pedophile or I embezzled [money]," Burnside said. Soon, he and his wife Angel couldn't sleep, could barely eat.

In the 30 years they've been together, Angel Burnside said, "It's the hardest thing we've been through as a couple."

What they didn't know is that hordes of social media users on Reddit and other platforms were praising Burnside for his compassion, shocked he was being reprimanded.

Photos of the children of Angel and Rob Burnside hanging in their home on June 11 in Loveland.

Burnside still remembers the words used in his formal hearing in November, with district leaders saying they didn't believe he could go back to Lakota East and be an "effective leader."

Those words crushed Burnside, who felt he became a professional at Lakota East – the building where he held his first teaching job for nine years before beginning his administrative career.

It was in the best interest for both his family and his financial health to make a career change, he said, handing in his formal resignation three weeks after being placed on leave.

Principal says he lost a career but gained a son and his kids gained a brother

Almost two years after resigning, Burnside said he's still scarred by prematurely ending his education career.

But more than anything, he feels blessed knowing – once the custody agreement became permanent in February 2025 – he and his wife gained a son and their kids gained a brother, Burnside said.

"They're my heroes," Angel Burnside said of her kids. Her two sons specifically, both of whom had moved out for college, gave up their bedroom so Hayes could have his own space.

As for Hayes, he's still learning how to make use of his closet and resist the urge to gather his possessions every time he leaves the house, like he often did while couch-surfing. And to Angel Burnside's dismay, he's still getting the hang of telling the Burnsides his whereabouts.

Angel Burnside looks to her son Landerius “DeDe” Hayes as he talks about his journey of overcoming homelessness and instability throughout high school before being placed in temporary custody of the Burnside family in November 2024 and being fully adopted in February 2025 on June 11 in Loveland.

"He ran his own life for so long," she said. "He wasn't used to having to tell people, 'I'm going here. I'm going there.'"

Hayes has his sights set on entering the aviation industry and is working as a car mechanic in the meantime, earning money that for the first time he doesn't need to put toward food or other necessities.

And Burnside is returning to his long-held belief in public education as means of changing lives.

"I think we all wonder, when push comes to shove, [if] we'll put it all on the line for our students," Burnside said. "I'm really envious of the people who never have to, but I'm thankful that I know how I answer that question."

Tips on How to Access Residential Treatment Records

Were You in Residential Treatment as a Minor? Here Are the Records You’re Entitled To.
This guide is for people impacted by the “troubled teen industry” to investigate abuses inside youth residential treatment facilities.
By Brittany Hailer and Michelle Billman of The Marshall Project, July 30, 2026.

***************
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Marshall Project thanks Addison Torrence and Caidyn Bearfield, who serve together as residential liaison for ACTION Ohio, for sharing practical guidance based on their lived experiences. We also thank Meg Appelgate, founder and CEO of Unsilenced, and Adam Marshall, the director of national litigation for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, for offering their insights on obtaining personal and public records related to youth residential treatment facilities.
***************

Jaycee Seele wanted proof she wasn’t making it all up. She wanted to know exactly how many times the adults at the residential treatment facility, where she lived for several months, had pinned her to the ground, physically restraining her. Once, she was so physically weak after being held down by staff members that she couldn’t stand up and urinated on herself. She had to be hospitalized for her injuries.

But was it actually as bad as she remembered?

In the summer of 2024, Jaycee drove to Foundations for Living, a residential treatment facility in Mansfield, Ohio. She passed through the chain-link fences and spools of barbed wire, walked into the building that had been the site of so much of her trauma, and asserted her legal right to her information. She walked out of the building with a stack of records taller than her infant daughter, showing that she had been restrained by facility staff dozens of times.

“I have nightmares. I just feel like I’m not healing,” Jaycee said. “Talking about it and getting awareness so it doesn’t happen to other kids is healing. I never got that. That’s why I’m trying to do all this.”

“We understand that former patients and their families may have different perspectives about their treatment experiences, and we take concerns raised about patient care seriously,” wrote Foundations for Living CEO Karen Spires in an email to The Marshall Project, noting that privacy laws prevented her from discussing the experiences of individual patients, like Jaycee. “When concerns are identified, they are investigated thoroughly and appropriate action is taken.”

People who attended youth residential treatment programs, or their parents, are entitled to many records from those facilities, thanks to federal HIPAA regulations. If you are underage or in a conservatorship, it may be harder to get your medical records than it would be for your parents or legal guardian.

If law enforcement responded to calls made from a facility during your time there, you may also be able to collect records they made about what happened under your state’s public records laws. Access to law enforcement records varies by location, type of record and whether it’s part of an active investigation. However, people are often able to acquire reports in which they are named, so it’s worth making the request. The worst they can say is “no.”

Obtaining these records can go a long way in validating your experiences of abuse, shedding light on your own medical history, flagging systemic problems for state lawmakers or journalists, and even seeking recourse through the legal system.

This 2024 Senate report about abuse and neglect at youth residential treatment facilities contains information about lawsuits that have been filed against these types of facilities.

Due to laws that determine how long organizations are required to keep records on file, survivors have a limited window of time to get their records before they can be destroyed. Retention laws can require facilities to maintain medical records anywhere from roughly 5 to 10 years. We have not found a single, comprehensive list of these time periods, but you can do an internet search to find the retention law for medical records in your state.

Even within retention windows, youth residential treatment facilities regularly shut down, switch ownership, or change how they store records, all of which can make it harder to track down your files.

If you’re not emotionally ready to read your records, advocates at Unsilenced, a nonprofit that serves victims of child abuse within the “troubled teen industry,” still suggest requesting them before they are potentially destroyed. Some survivors have asked a trusted friend or family member to store their records until they are ready to read them.

The Marshall Project’s coverage of dangerous conditions at residential treatment facilities would not have been possible without survivors tracking down their own records. Some survivors are using their records to spread broader awareness of the “troubled teen industry” and offer practical advice on how other survivors can do the same.

This guide breaks down what records you are legally entitled to and strategies for how to get them.

If you would like to share your story with The Marshall Project, please fill out this form. We cannot investigate every submission; however, in some cases, we may be able to connect you with a journalist in your own community for their consideration. You are welcome to send any related questions to youth-residential@themarshallproject.org.

In this toolkit:
  • Records from the facility
  • Records from law enforcement
  • Records from child-placing agencies
  • Additional context to consider
  • How to navigate denials
Records from the facility
Depending on your goals, gathering your medical records from the youth residential treatment center you attended might be your top priority, so we’ll start with how to collect those records and then break down other documents you may want to track down as well.

Here is a records request template with a detailed list of documents the facility may have on file about you, including but not limited to:
  • Medical records, including clinical notes, medication charts, psychotherapy notes and many other records. You may also have medical records at a nearby hospital if you were admitted for emergency care.
  • Discharge summary
  • Seclusion and restraint reports. You can learn more about these practices here.
  • Pictures, which may show injuries sustained during your stay
  • Various forms of correspondence, including interoffice memos and communications about treatment or hospitalization
  • Security footage
You may have to confirm your identity by sharing your driver’s license (or other form of ID card), address, or some sort of certification of identity form.

Remember that there are no concerns about plagiarism when it comes to making records requests, so you’re free to copy and paste the template language or other examples you find.

By law, facilities should give you your records within 30 days. If they don’t, you can file a HIPAA complaint with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights. Here are instructions on how to file the complaint. Keep in mind that records retention laws differ by state, and while facilities may impose fees for sharing medical records, there are limits to what they can charge.

The National Disability Rights Network has legal authority to access records from residential treatment facilities in all 50 states. Within that network, here are the state Protection and Advocacy agencies that may be able to help you secure your records.

Another helpful resource for tracking down facility records may be a youth ombudsperson office, like this office in Ohio or this one in New York. A youth ombudsperson (sometimes referred to as an “ombudsman” or “advocate”) office is an independent organization that investigates complaints, including concerns about children’s services and placements. In some states, like California, there may be one office focused on kids in foster care and another focused on kids in the juvenile justice system, along with county offices, like this one in Los Angeles.

You can learn more about the role of an ombudsperson in this explainer by the National Conference of State Legislatures, which includes a list of offices by state.

We have information below with tips on what to do when a records request is denied.

Records from law enforcement
Did you ever see police officers or sheriff’s deputies in the facility? Did you ever make or hear about 911 calls? Law enforcement can be called to a facility for several reasons, such as a false alarm, a runaway teen, a suicide attempt, an assault, a sexual assault, a riot, an arrest or a hospitalization. In these situations, law enforcement officials likely wrote down a record of what happened that you can obtain.

Law enforcement records are important because they provide external documentation of what’s happening inside of a facility. Some departments have quite detailed documentation, and officers don’t work for the facility, so their records may be more neutral or transparent than facility records.

Incident reports
When someone at a residential facility calls 911, it prompts local law enforcement to document what happened in a police report. These are often called incident reports, but there are other types of police reports you can review here.

You can request any reports associated with your name from the law enforcement agency that responds to the facility, and you can request multiple reports within a single records request. It may be hard to remember what agency responded to your facility, so it’s important to look for the police department or sheriff’s office in the town or county where the facility is located.

It may be helpful to know the year or rough timeframe of the incident. When you request those reports, you can also ask for any attached or supporting documents and investigative notes. The attachments could include things like drone footage, additional body camera footage, and indications about whether any kids or teens were interviewed by law enforcement.

If the police responded to a facility while you were there, there may be body camera footage showing what they experienced. Hearing how the police interacted with each other and facility staff members during an incident can be helpful, especially if the officer commented on ongoing poor conditions, which we’ve seen several times in our investigations.

State laws related to accessing body cam footage vary. In Alabama, for instance, body cam footage is not a public record, but people can request body cam footage in which they are visible and potentially view it at the police station. If you are told you can’t access body camera footage in which you would be visible, explain that you are the subject of the record and ask what law prevents you from accessing it.

In other states, like Michigan, subjects of body camera recordings and their parents (if the subject is a minor) can request access to, and even a copy of, the footage. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press offers a guide showing body camera access laws in every state.

Body camera footage turned over to members of the public is often redacted, meaning faces and other identifying details can be blurred. You can find more information on how to handle redactions here.

To learn more about laws in your state related to accessing police records, you can use the Open Government Guide, provided by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Here are the steps to take:
  • First, go to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press’ Open Government Guide.
  • Next, click on the state you’re interested in.
  • On the left-hand side, scroll down until you see section O, which is called “Police Records.”
  • Then, select the type of police record you’re interested in learning about.
  • Finally, click the yellow “compare” button, and it’ll generate a summary of the laws in every state related to accessing that specific record.
  • Within the Open Government Guide, you can also find details about how long agencies in each state have to respond to records requests by selecting a state and scrolling down on the left-hand side to section IV (under Open Records), part B, which is called “How long to wait.”
The amount of time an agency has to respond and to actually fulfill a request varies from state to state. 

Records from child-placing agencies
Foster care agencies, which are typically run by state or county governments, may place children into residential treatment facilities. If you were placed into a facility by a county agency, they should have your case file, which may contain information about transfers, investigations into neglect and abuse, and any other allegations. Since the agency is in charge of keeping kids safe, they can investigate alleged abuse or neglect, so they may also have investigation files and any surveillance footage about your facility.

Additional context to consider
Populations in congregate care, shelter care, and foster care are often overlooked by the public, and they lack meaningful pop culture representation. Many people simply don’t know that youth residential treatment facilities exist or what happens inside them. And yet, the abuse and neglect within them have been widespread for decades, as evidenced by a list of deceased victims of the “troubled teen industry” maintained by Breaking Code Silence, a nonprofit advocacy group that supports survivors.

We’ve heard from survivors that when people leave a residential treatment facility, they may feel a spectrum of emotions. They may be unsure if what they experienced actually qualifies as abuse. They may feel guilt about other residents enduring more suffering than they did. The process of gathering your records can bring up intense feelings, including self-doubt and shame, and reviewing the records can be upsetting, since they may include details of abuse and neglect you don’t remember. There are opportunities for seeking peer support, so you don’t have to go through this alone. There are community groups, youth advocacy organizations and the r/troubledteens subreddit. There are also local support groups for foster care alumni, provided by organizations such as Foster Care Alumni of America.

Throughout this process, you may decide you want to report abuse or neglect related to a facility or an individual provider, such as a doctor, nurse, therapist, social worker or psychologist. If so, here is a list of licensing authorities.

How to navigate denials
Expect resistance and delays while pursuing your records. This is normal. The entire process can take several months, and you will likely have to push back if you receive incomplete records by repeatedly asking for “any and all records” that are associated with you. You may try every option and still be denied certain records. A public records request is a negotiation, and getting a denial doesn’t necessarily mean you did anything wrong. The professional journalists at The Marshall Project are frequently denied records and often push back to assert their First Amendment freedoms.

If someone isn’t responding, email the same person every two to three days for a few weeks. Even if you feel ignored, don’t accuse them of ignoring you, and don’t focus the communication on your feelings. Once a few weeks go by, start copying other people at the agency so they see your correspondence about the request. You can be polite while also being firm about what the law requires.

Here are some obstacles you may encounter when trying to access your records from a private facility:

  • Survivors have told us that facilities have insisted they collect their records in person, which can be challenging due to a lack of transportation or childcare, along with the potential for bringing up old trauma. If this happens, you can ask the facility to point to the specific law or policy requiring in-person collection.
  • A facility may say they can only fax you the records. You can push back, telling them you don’t own a fax machine and need the records mailed or emailed.
  • If you are denied records, ask the facility to point to the state statute, law or policy that explicitly states why they cannot share the records. Denying you your own records can be against the law, so the facility will need to provide specific justification for withholding documents.
  • If you continue to be denied, you might consider finding a First Amendment attorney near you (they often work for universities) or consulting this directory of lawyers who want to help survivors of residential treatment programs.
  • When an entity misses a response deadline, which is likely, you can email them to document the missed deadline and to request the records again. If they keep missing deadlines, you can file a HIPAA complaint for medical records.
  • If your requests aren’t being taken seriously, which is an unfortunate reality for youth who have been labeled and stigmatized as “problematic,” you might consider asking a parent or older person to request your records to see if they have a different outcome.
Here are some obstacles you may encounter when trying to access public records from law enforcement or state or local government:
  • There are some exemptions to public records laws, which can vary by state. For instance, law enforcement may exempt body cam footage or other records if they’re part of an active criminal investigation.
  • Many kids or teens are sent to a facility in a different state. If you were never a resident of the state where the facility in question is located, or you’ve since moved away, there may be a residency requirement for public records requests made to law enforcement and state and local governments (though your current location should not affect requests for your private facility records). In these six states, you have to be a resident in order to file a request: Arkansas, Tennessee, Kentucky, Virginia, Delaware and Alabama. Finding a proxy, such as a friend, family member, attorney or journalist based in the state where the facility is located, could help in instances when you need a resident of that state to file the request. Keep in mind that due to HIPAA, a journalist cannot retrieve your medical records.
  • If you get to view body camera footage from law enforcement, but it’s too heavily redacted to be useful, ask what law allows for so many redactions when you are the subject of the footage. You could also consider asking a lawyer to write a “compel” or “demand” letter to urge the agency to release the unredacted footage to you.
For your correspondence with the facility and other entities that have your records, you should include: what the law requires of the facility or agency, a list of every record you are requesting, the number of days they have to fulfill the request, and a deadline for them to send the records. 

You could also say something to the effect of “I want every document and material you have on me — even things I haven’t mentioned,” and see what you get back. And remember, your emails don’t need to include personal details or an explanation of why you want the records. All that matters is that you want them.

Sunday, August 09, 2026

The Marshall Project Article about Fox Run

It Was Supposed to Be a Haven for Troubled Teens. They Risked Everything to Escape
Brittany Hailer and Ilica Mahajan, The Marshall Project, July 30, 2026.

Clockwise from top left: Paitin Pahoundis, who spent time at the Fox Run Center for Children and Adolescents; a view of the Fox Run facility; Isabella Ramirez, who also spent time at Fox Run; and a view of the sign for the facility. 

Paitin Pahoundis jolted awake, a siren blaring in her ears. Her friend Samantha Primeau was in her room. It was time. The other girls, Samantha told her, were gone. They had jammed a sprinkler, triggering the fire alarm and filling the hallway outside with water. Their escape plan was working. But there was a problem: Paitin didn’t have shoes.

The checkered Vans and the white Jordans with the bright orange stripes that her father had bought her before he went to prison, the ones she meticulously kept in mint condition, had been taken by staff and locked in another room, along with the rest of her possessions. She was on “no personals” status for not following the rules. But, Paitin wanted out, and this was her chance.

As they walked out of the building and into a snowstorm, Paitin remembers a staff member standing in a doorway. She looked at Paitin and said, “If you want to go, just go.”

Over the five years reviewed, law enforcement officials visited the Fox Run facility, on average, once every 21 days. They went for 52 assaults and 17 sexual assaults. Nate Smallwood for The Marshall Project

Both teens said they dreamed of escaping the staff members who forcibly held them down hard enough to leave bruises, the blood in the hallways from kids cutting themselves, the girls strangling themselves with bedsheets, the adults who insisted no family wanted to adopt them and who looked through them like they were already gone.

On that January night in 2022, the girls careened down the hill below the Fox Run Center for Children and Adolescents, their pumping adrenaline temporarily masking the frigid Ohio air. Not even Paitin’s soaking wet socks slipping off in the snow could deter her descent toward freedom.

Barefoot, Paitin crossed the highway that snakes along the back end of Fox Run’s grounds, dodging cars and climbing over medians. As they considered going to a nearby hotel, things started to fall apart.

Electric pain ripped through Paitin’s frozen feet. Samantha felt herself getting sleepy and slowed to a crawl, wishing she could pass out right there. They had nowhere to go. All they could do was turn back in failure.

At the top of the hill, police dragged Paitin into a squad car. She pounded the window, screaming in agony. Before she was hospitalized, Paitin recalls a staff member walking up and peering in. “I bet you will never do that again, will you?”

She would, she told herself. “I would rather be dead outside in the snow.”

Over the five years reviewed, law enforcement officials visited the Fox Run facility, on average, once every 21 days. They went for 52 assaults and 17 sexual assaults.

Samantha Primeau spent time in and out of residential treatment centers as a teenager. She escaped together with Paitin Pahoundis from the Fox Run Center for Children and Adolescents during a snowstorm in January of 2022. Bethany Mollenkof for The Marshall Project 

Paitin spent three years at Fox Run in St. Clairsville, Ohio. She escaped multiple times and once made it across the state line from Ohio into West Virginia. Bethany Mollenkof for The Marshall Project

Paitin and Samantha desperately wanted to escape what was supposed to be a therapeutic haven for kids with mental health and behavioral issues. Instead, they found themselves confined for months — in Paitin’s case, years — inside an institution where they witnessed kids routinely attacking and sexually assaulting each other, anarchic riots by children pushed to the breaking point, and suicide attempts using makeshift weapons fashioned from scraps of metal or bedsheets, according to police and state records and numerous interviews.

They endured violence from some of the adults charged with their care, medically unnecessary sedative injections and long, painful periods of being physically held down by staff. Many of those same episodes, some of which ended with children in handcuffs or ambulances, appear to be missing from the state’s own oversight records, according to an analysis by The Marshall Project. This leaves parents, caseworkers, regulators, and the judges deciding where to place kids in foster care with an incomplete picture of what was happening behind the facility’s locked doors.

As the number of youth prisons dwindles in a nationwide push for rehabilitation over punishment, the juvenile justice system continues to place kids in residential treatment facilities like Fox Run. However, advocates say the facilities are “virtually indistinguishable from incarceration.” Some, like one in Pennsylvania with a record of child abuse, have secured contracts to house migrant children amid the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown.

Fox Run, one of Ohio’s largest youth residential treatment centers, is owned by Universal Health Services, a Pennsylvania-based Fortune 500 company. It’s a privately operated, 100-bed facility housing boys and girls as young as 5 from as far away as Alaska. Many of the youth are sent by their parents, foster care agencies, and juvenile courts. 

County governments across Ohio have paid Fox Run millions of dollars to house children who have complex mental health or behavioral needs, according to county contracts. Kids were sent to Fox Run following suicide attempts or fights while in foster care. Others were placed by their parents at a doctor’s recommendation after a suicide attempt. Some, like Paitin, who lived at the facility for three years, found themselves at Fox Run because no foster parent would take them.

To understand what was happening inside Fox Run, The Marshall Project reviewed hundreds of pages of police and state inspection reports between 2020 and 2025, obtained through public records requests, and interviewed seven women previously housed in the facility. These records and interviews told stories of children desperate to escape, fleeing into cornfields, sprinting into traffic, and attempting to hitchhike. Former Fox Run staff members said the youth turned violent inside the facility because they were pushed to their limit. Many eventually ended up in juvenile detention as their behavior escalated. They thought ending up behind bars, like facing the frozen woods, would be an improvement over Fox Run.

In a statement, Fox Run CEO Randy MacKendrick said the facility serves children with “complex behavioral health needs” and that incidents involving aggression, self-harm, suicide and attempts to leave the facility are “unfortunately not uncommon among this high-acuity population.”

“Fox Run cooperates with state regulators and other oversight agencies, investigates concerns, and implements corrective actions whenever warranted,” MacKendrick added. “When concerns arise, they are reviewed promptly and, when appropriate, reported to the appropriate regulatory and law enforcement authorities.”

While officials from the Belmont County Sheriff’s Office diligently documented desperate attempts by children to get out of Fox Run, often through violence, many of those incidents were absent from a database maintained by the Department of Behavioral Health, the state agency charged with licensing and inspecting the facility. The Ohio Department of Behavioral Health and Belmont County Sheriff’s Office did not respond to multiple requests for comment. At least 40 incidents of violent and desperate behavior at Fox Run reported by deputies do not appear in a state database that is meant to track what happens inside residential treatment facilities.

Samantha Primeau spent time in and out of residential treatment centers as a teenager. She escaped together with Paitin Pahoundis from the Fox Run Center for Children and Adolescents during a snowstorm in January of 2022.  Paitin spent three years at Fox Run in St. Clairsville, Ohio. She escaped multiple times and once made it across the state line from Ohio into West Virginia. 

What They’re Running From
Two years after Paitin and Samantha briefly considered seeking help at the nearby hotel, a 12-year-old trans boy walked into its lobby.

He fled Fox Run after a girl entered his room while he was sleeping, pressed a pillow over his head and wrapped her hands around his neck, according to a sheriff’s office report. Another youth stole a staff member’s keys and let the boy out.

He ran down the hill, crossed the highway and reached the hotel, where he told workers he was a runaway. They called the police. He was returned to Fox Run and arrested for theft. He had taken the keys with him when he fled.

Over the five years of police records reviewed by The Marshall Project, law enforcement officials visited the facility, on average, once every 21 days. They went for 52 assaults and 17 sexual assaults; some of those cases involved allegations of physical and sexual violence by staff. Police also responded to calls for unruly behavior or kids running away, or went to the facility after family members called for wellness checks because they couldn’t reach their children, or because their children reported abuses.

In March 2022, a staff member reported to police that an 11-year-old “forcibly sodomized” a 9-year-old boy while several other youths barricaded the door with a mattress. A Fox Run nurse told a detective that understaffing meant staff frequently left the floor “leaving the juveniles unattended.” Others said workers might have been out on smoke breaks.

The child was initially taken to a nearby hospital, but the facility lacked anyone certified to conduct a forensic examination. A nurse ordered a transfer to a hospital with trained personnel, but the child was instead returned to Fox Run without receiving a forensic exam.

The next day, when the nurse realized the child had missed the appointment, she contacted the police, reporting significant bruising to the face and rectal area. She said Fox Run staff delayed the child’s exam while waiting for permission from an out-of-state guardian and expressed serious concern for the child’s well-being, according to a sheriff’s office report.

When an officer returned to Fox Run, they found staff members were unclear on procedures for handling sexual assault allegations. It was only when the officer ultimately contacted the child’s out-of-state caseworker for verbal consent that the process of securing the necessary exam moved forward — a day later than the nurse’s order.

Two years later, state inspectors found Fox Run mishandled a separate sexual misconduct complaint — with staff encouraging a girl to work on her “assertiveness skills” after a male resident exposed himself and touched her, instead of addressing the boy’s actions.

Police also documented cases of staff directly causing harm to children.

In 2022, a staff member “violently” kicked an 11-year-old and after she was fired, she admitted to police that “she had done wrong.” She pleaded guilty to assault and was sentenced to 180 days in jail. In 2024, another staffer was terminated when he shoved his elbow into a boy’s mouth, leaving a visible red mark, after the boy hit him with a broom and called him a racial obscenity.

Last year, state inspectors discovered a child with a chipped tooth was not taken to a dentist for more than two months, nor were they given their prescribed antibiotics. Fox Run management subsequently reported a staff nurse to the state nursing board over the incident. State records indicate several suspected abuse cases in which MacKendrick, or another manager, personally called police, fired employees or notified other authorities.

Abigail, who was placed at Fox Run in late 2020 after a suicide attempt and asked to be identified only by her first name, remembers hearing other girls, including Paitin, screaming while being physically restrained by staff.

Legally, residential treatment staff can physically restrain a child by holding them to stop them from moving, typically because they believe the child is a danger to themselves or others. Sometimes staff will hold kids on the ground, against a wall or bend them over from behind. The use of mechanical devices — like belts, straps or harnesses — to restrain anyone under the age of 18 is prohibited in the state of Ohio and The Marshall Project’s review of state oversight reports and police records did not uncover evidence of these kinds of mechanical restraints being used.

“You just hear [her] screaming like, ‘I can’t breathe. You’re hurting me,’” Abigail said. “You’re listening to this, and there’s nothing anybody can do, and we’re all just like, in the room. I was sobbing. There were a lot of other people crying. People are trying to comfort other people … You’re just exposed constantly to violence from staff, violence from kids.”

Isabella Ramirez, who also lived in Fox Run with Paitin, said that kids would regularly misbehave in the hopes of being sent to juvenile detention. “At Fox Run, we begged the officers. We’d be bad in front of the officers just so they’d take us.” Isabella, who also had traumatizing experiences at several other residential treatment centers throughout her teens, recalled. “But they couldn’t take no more because the cells were full.”

Isabella Ramirez, who also lived in Fox Run, said that kids would regularly misbehave in the hopes of being sent to juvenile detention. Bethany Mollenkof for The Marshall Project

Recalling when she was held down by Fox Run workers, Isabella said, “[My skin] was purple. And I could get gasps of air out, saying I could not breathe.” Memories of the younger children at Fox Run, ages 5 to 6, who were held in what she said was called the “Dreams Unit,” still haunt her.

“Grown men would throw them like ragdolls,” she said of the children. “They’re just so little. They’re scared.”

Last July, a 15-year-old girl told a staff member, “I will do whatever I can to get the fuck out of this place,” after using metal brackets from the ceiling to cut her arm and threatening to cut staff members, according to a sheriff’s office report.

In 2021, a teenager who was denied the use of crutches by Fox Run staff, “immediately begged not to be taken back to the facility” after a police officer called for an ambulance to treat her injured leg and self-harm injuries.

An officer with the Belmont Sheriff’s Office spoke to a Fox Run employee while responding to a call in January 2022. “This administration’s got to do something here," he said. "How many calls have we been here in the last six months for?” Belmont County Sheriff's Office

Fox Run reported 126 suicide attempts to state inspectors from January 2022 to June 2025, a number that Marissa C. Nardi, lead counsel at youth advocacy nonprofit Children’s Rights, said “is not normal” and should “deeply alarm the state and prompt a thorough investigation.”

Children who attempted suicide at Fox Run sometimes found themselves behind bars with criminal charges because they threatened or attacked staff after wrapping bedsheets around their necks, cutting themselves or trying to swallow screws.

“If kids locked in a treatment facility are being traumatized instead of treated, to the point of regularly attempting suicide, fleeing into the woods, or seeking incarceration as a safer option, there is no acceptable justification for the state to keep placing children there,” Nardi said.

Using detention as a response to youth acting out in distress is a system failure, said Jeffrey Shook, a professor of social work, law and sociology at the University of Pittsburgh. Once children are in these systems, behavior gets criminalized, leading to deeper justice involvement rather than meaningful help. Mobile crisis teams or outside social workers, he said, should respond to calls involving youth crises while in psychiatric care.

“Taking that sheet and attempting to hang yourself. You’re saying something right there,” Shook said. ”Are we listening to that?”

An Industry Under Scrutiny
Since the 1950s, youth residential treatment centers, often rooted in religious-based behavior modification methods, have evolved into substance use or mental health treatment centers, boarding schools or wilderness camps. (Fox Run and its parent company are not religiously affiliated). The industry remains loosely regulated due to weak federal oversight and insufficient tracking of abuses, experts say.

The number of youth involved in the juvenile justice system who were placed in residential treatment facilities was around 29,300 in 2023, a jump of 4,400 from just two years earlier, figures from the Department of Justice show. At the beginning of this year, roughly 1,000 children were living in around 140 facilities in Ohio, according to state data.

Universal Health Services has faced two federal probes into its care of children, including one that led to a $122 million settlement with the federal government in 2020 after allegations that the company billed taxpayers for medically unnecessary services while failing to provide adequate care to patients. UHS was also the subject of a $553 million verdict in a negligence lawsuit in 2024, which the company settled out of court last year.

Fox Run’s parent company, Universal Health Services, has faced two federal probes into its care of children. Nate Smallwood for The Marshall Project

The U.S. Senate Finance Committee investigated UHS in 2024, alongside three other residential treatment providers. The committee found evidence of systemic abuse in different facilities across the four companies.

The committee’s report included two UHS facilities in Ohio — Belmont Pines Hospital in Youngstown and Foundations for Living in Mansfield — where records documented children being assaulted, improperly restrained and inappropriately medicated. Routine inspections by Ohio regulators have documented similar conditions at Fox Run.

In a response to the committee’s 2024 report, the company called the findings “incomplete and misleading.” UHS maintained that it took action when appropriate and thoroughly investigated allegations made by individuals and inspectors.

The Senate report “fails to recognize the thousands of children helped by our facilities over the years; children whose lives have been greatly enhanced as a result of their stay and the treatment they received,” UHS’ response read.

The conditions at residential facilities have even attracted celebrity attention. In 2024, Paris Hilton testified before Congress that she experienced physical and sexual abuse as a teenager at a residential treatment center in Utah and has pushed for reform.

Even so, a 2024 report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General found that nearly a third of states cannot identify patterns of maltreatment in residential facilities because they do not consistently track where abuse occurs.

Enough people have been traumatized by going through the system that a community on Reddit for “survivors and advocates who oppose the abusive Troubled Teen Industry” has swelled to tens of thousands of users over the past 15 years.

Organizations like Breaking Code Silence and Unsilenced gather testimony from people who experienced mistreatment. They also collect government documents — including inspections, investigations and citations of facilities across the country. Each website also offers templates and instructions for former residents to request their records from facilities.

‘No Child Should Be in There’

Six months before her escape in the snow, Paitin ran away with her friend Isabella. They were a part of a group of 10 girls, one of whom was hospitalized after she threatened to run into traffic. They made it about 10 miles down the road to Wheeling, West Virginia.

Police picked them up after the pair contacted their parents, who turned them in. The girls told Fox Run staff they’d hitchhiked with a local man who bought them clothes at Target and gave them money. Isabella said the man had a brother who had been placed in Fox Run. He understood their desire for freedom.

In bodycam footage obtained by The Marshall Project, an officer searching for the girls expresses his frustration on a phone call. “That fucking place needs [to be] shut down. I’m tired of it … I said this is ridiculous … Fucking shit hole,” the officer says.

“They’re just going to run again later,” he added, referring to the girls.

Several other adults connected to Fox Run shared the officer’s frustrations. In interviews, five former Fox Run employees told The Marshall Project that children lived in a constant state of crisis. One worker, Julie Lipscomb, was left with bruises, nerve damage from a bite wound and stress so severe she said her hair began falling out. “That place could turn the nicest person into what they feel like is a monster,” she said.

Sydney Smith, who worked at Fox Run for about four months last year after graduating high school nearby, underwent training on physically restraining kids before stepping out on the floor at Fox Run. But she said she wasn’t prepared for the reality of what she was asked to do.

“You were pinning children to the floor, usually one person on each arm and a person like laying perpendicular over their body,” Smith said. “And then somebody holding their head where they couldn’t bite you.”

State inspectors cited Fox Run multiple times for its use of restraints, inspection records show. One child under age 9 was held down for a full hour, double the state’s maximum time limit. Four other children were restrained for “substantial” periods despite being described as “calm, non-combative and quiet.” In 2022, inspectors found Fox Run injected children with sedatives without a clear link to a psychiatric condition.

Wendy Opic, who worked at Fox Run when Isabella and Paitin were there, said she still prays for the children inside the facility. She remembers a manager thanking her for de-escalating children through conversation instead of restraining them. “Isn’t this what you’re supposed to do?” Opic thought to herself. “Be nice to these children?”

“I kept thinking, how do you get this place shut down? Because I don’t know how to do anything like that. No child should be in there,” she said.

As she cried, she added: “They were just treated like animals.”

What Regulators Can’t See
The Marshall Project obtained inspection reports from the Department of Behavioral Health — the state agency regulating residential facilities for kids with significant behavioral health needs, like Fox Run — from September 2021 to February 2025. Inspectors cited Fox Run for unsafe restraints, medical neglect, understaffing and deteriorating facility conditions. However, inspection records do not show state follow-up investigations tied to those incidents.

Additionally, it seems that many incidents may have never reached regulators’ attention. An analysis of Fox Run’s self-reported incident data from January 2022 through June of 2025 found that at least 40 incidents involving police did not appear in state documents. An Ohio statute requires residential treatment facilities to report suicide attempts, arrests, assaults and child hospitalizations to the state within 24 hours of the occurrence.

The incidents for which the state had no record included: a child being arrested or taken to a juvenile detention center (21 incidents), assaults (15 incidents), and hospitalizations or evaluations by emergency medical services (9 incidents). The story of the trans boy who was arrested after being assaulted and escaping to the hotel did not appear in these official records.

The Department of Behavioral Health did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Of the 40 incidents that did not appear in state records, MacKendrick, the Fox Run CEO, said that a state review showed that some “were not reportable” while others “were appropriately reported,” but did not indicate which, or how many, of the dozens of incidents fell into each category.

MacKendrick noted that the facility had not been cited for violating the law for its handling of the reporting of any of the incidents The Marshall Project identified as not being in the state’s database.

Lax government oversight has largely been the norm for Ohio’s youth residential treatment industry. While several of the state’s residential treatment centers have voluntarily surrendered their licenses to operate following pressure from media or investigative agencies, only a few have actually had their licenses revoked. Most companies instead reach settlements with the state.

A watchdog group, Disability Rights Ohio, has the right under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to investigate residential treatment facilities, usually triggered by complaints from children and parents. The group’s investigations in recent years led to voluntary license suspensions by Sequel Pomegranate Health Systems in Columbus and Youth Intensive Services in Youngstown.

However, some state lawmakers want to force regulators into more aggressive responses when facilities harm children. A bill recently introduced in the Ohio House of Representatives by Rep. Crystal Lett would require the Department of Behavioral Health to take measures against youth treatment facilities with incidents of violence and other serious violations. That could mean even shutting them down rather than leaving the agency with discretion over what sanctions to impose, if any.

Lett said she introduced the measure in response to The Marshall Project’s investigation in November 2025 that revealed escalating violence, staff injuries and campus-wide fights at Mohican Young Star Academy, Ohio’s largest youth treatment facility. The report also led to the state suspending admissions to the facility and a license revocation hearing that began this June.

“With respect to the revocation hearing, we are unable to comment on pending litigation. We look forward to vindicating our rights through the appropriate legal process and do not believe there is merit to the alleged violations,” Mohican owner Zach Logan wrote in an email.

Mohican, which rebranded as Empowering to Elevate Academy in late 2025, has previously withstood at least two state efforts to shut it down. In 2021, former Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost sued to remove the facility’s then-operator, Olga Strasser, over allegations of improper restraints, but a judge dismissed the case for lack of evidence. Yost vowed to move forward with revoking the facility’s license, but the state’s ongoing effort hasn’t been successful.

“Just the fact that it’s continuing in real time. It was our proof that this isn’t a hypothetical situation that we’re legislating for. It’s a real situation unfolding,” Lett said in April of this year. “I can’t help thinking: If my kid were in there right now, what am I doing to help that kid?”

A photo shows a White woman with long blue hair, wearing a blue T-shirt, standing in front of a white building. Some leaves from a tree are visible above her. 

A black-and-white photo shows a Mexican American woman sitting in the driver’s seat of a car, looking out the window. 

A White woman with reddish blonde hair, wearing a black tube top and jean shorts, sits under a tree. 

 Paitin desperately wanted to escape what was supposed to be a therapeutic haven for kids. Instead, she found herself routinely witnessing kids attacking and sexually assaulting each other. Bethany Mollenkof for The Marshall Project 

 Isabella, who is raising her toddler, has been accepted to college. She wants to go into nursing to help kids like her. Bethany Mollenkof for The Marshall Project 

 “I did a lot of crazy things in residential, but it was because of the environment. There’s only so much a person can take,” said Samantha, who now spends as much time as she can in nature, reading and taking photos with friends. Bethany Mollenkof for The Marshall Project

For the children who have come out the other side of living in residential treatment, the healing process is often a slow one.

Years after her escape and discharge, Paitin still has the shoes staff members took from her, but she never put them on after getting out. She’s kept them pristine, a cherished object from her dad. “It hurts me to see them dirty,” she said. When he visited her at her new apartment, he immediately noticed the shoes. “He looked happy,” Paitin said.

Paitin, Samantha and Isabella have a collection of various items from their stays in Fox Run and other residential treatment facilities: clothes with their initials still written on the tags, journals, drawings, and, for some of them, medical records detailing psychiatric treatment.

When Paitin requested her records, Fox Run administrators told her she’d have to return to the facility to get her paper documents. She said she had a panic attack in the parking lot and couldn’t set foot in the building.

It’s just one way the facility’s impact lingers.

“I’m more quiet, reserved now, and it’s just not who I remember me being,” Paitin said. “Like, it makes me want to cry. I remember being so bubbly and everything. Now I just feel like I’m stuck in the same mindset ... It’s kind of like I’m numb.”

She still dreams of running. Sometimes she wakes up and forgets she’s no longer locked inside Fox Run. Other days, she dreams of what life is like outside of Ohio and its expanse of cornfields. For now, she leans on her friends. They Snapchat, call and text each other. They gather evidence and give it to a journalist. They hope for change.

“I just feel bad for the kids that are still there,” Paitin said.

Related Posts with Thumbnails